People v. Cantrell
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Per curiam
The assistant disciplinary counsel and the respondent entered into a stipulation, agree ment, and conditional admission of misconduct. C.R.C.P. 241.18. The conditional admission recommended that the respondent receive discipline in the range of public censure to a thirty-day suspension from the practice of law. An inquiry panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee approved the stipulation, and recommended a public censure. We accept the stipulation and the inquiry panel’s recommendation.
I
The respondent was admitted to the Colorado bar in 1975. The conditional admission discloses:
A
On June…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. TuckerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- People v. HickoxSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- People v. KolencSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. HanksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- People v. PrimaveraSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- People v. ShidlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- People v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.