Legal Opinion

In re the Detention of Coppin

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 16, 2010No. 64963-9-IPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

¶1 The sexually violent predator act (SVPA), chapter 71.09 RCW, is civil in nature and provides for the right to demand a trial before a 12-person jury.1 But the *540right to a jury trial in a civil case may be waived. Whether to refuse a jury demand after such waiver is a question addressed by the trial court’s sound exercise of discretion.2

¶2 Here, John Coppin did not make a jury demand until the morning of his trial. Moreover, he expressly waived, on the record during a court hearing and in writing, his right to a jury six days before his trial. We hold that the trial court did not abuse its…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Matter of Personal Restraint of YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. KellerWashington Supreme Court · 2001

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Of Washington v. Manuel GonzalesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  2. LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  3. Life Care Centers of America, Inc. v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  4. In Re the Detention of Taylor-RoseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  5. State Of Washington, V Franklin Hershel WilcoxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API