In Re the Detention of Taylor-Rose
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Maxa, A.C.J.
¶1 Brian Taylor-Rose appeals his civil commitment as a sexually violent predator (SVP) under RCW 71.09.060 following a jury trial.
¶2 We hold that (1) the trial court did not err in instructing the jury that second degree child molestation is a crime of sexual violence, (2) the State provided sufficient evidence that Taylor-Rose was likely to engage in predatory acts of sexual violence if not confined to a secure facility, (3) the trial court did not err in instructing the jury to determine Taylor-Rose’s risk level if released “unconditionally” from detention on the SVP petition,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- State v. KylloWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. KylloWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. LevyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. LevyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re The Detention Of: Charles UrlacherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Courtney Allen, Et Ano. v. Todd Zonis, Et Ano.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- In Re The Detention Of: Michael CantyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Justin Helmbreck v. Paula McpheeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- Spee West Construction Co., V. David WalterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.