Legal Opinion

In Re the Detention of Taylor-Rose

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 25, 2017No. 47975-3-IIPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maxa, A.C.J.

¶1 Brian Taylor-Rose appeals his civil commitment as a sexually violent predator (SVP) under RCW 71.09.060 following a jury trial.

¶2 We hold that (1) the trial court did not err in instructing the jury that second degree child molestation is a crime of sexual violence, (2) the State provided sufficient evidence that Taylor-Rose was likely to engage in predatory acts of sexual violence if not confined to a secure facility, (3) the trial court did not err in instructing the jury to determine Taylor-Rose’s risk level if released “unconditionally” from detention on the SVP petition,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. State v. KylloWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. KylloWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. LevyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. LevyWashington Supreme Court · 2006

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re The Detention Of: Charles UrlacherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  2. Courtney Allen, Et Ano. v. Todd Zonis, Et Ano.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  3. In Re The Detention Of: Michael CantyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  4. Justin Helmbreck v. Paula McpheeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  5. Spee West Construction Co., V. David WalterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API