Legal Opinion
Fairview Public Utility District No. One v. City of Anchorage
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided February 2, 1962No. 69, 71PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOND, Justice.
These appeals concern the validity of the annexation of the Fairview Public Utility District to the City of Anchorage.
Following a constitutional directive 1 , the legislature in 1959 established a Local Boundary Commission. 2 It was authorized to consider and recommend to the legislature any proposed local government boundary change, which would become effective no later than the end of the legislative session unless disapproved by a resolution concurred in by a majority of the members of each house. 3
In 1960 the Commission presented to the legislature its recommendation that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gomillion v. LightfootSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Hunter v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Mount Pleasant v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Kelly v. PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- In Re Sanitary Bd. of E. Fruitvale Sanitary Dist.California Supreme Court · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Mobil Oil Corporation v. Local Boundary CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Hootch Ex Rel. Hootch v. Alaska State-Operated School SystemAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Torres v. Village of CapitanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- United States Smelting, Refining & Mining Co. v. Local Boundary CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Harrison v. City of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.