Legal Opinion

Theodore v. Williams

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 30, 1919No. Civ. No. 3074PublishedCited by 8 opinions

PROCEEDING in Mandamus to compel R. Y. Williams, as the Judge of the Superior Court of Orange County, to adjudge a certain person guilty of contempt for violation of an injunction. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court,

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an original proceeding in mandate to compel the superior court of Orange County to adjudge J. L. Adkins guilty of contempt for the violation of a decree granting an injunction against him in an action therefor, wherein petitioners were plaintiffs and he was defendant.

Petitioners were the proprietors of a laundry in the city of Anaheim, operated under the name of the Anaheim Laun dry. As an employee of petitioners, Adkins had charge of laundry route No. 1 in said city, his duty being to gather from and return to customers in such territory the articles consigned to petitioners for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Inglin v. HoppinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. New Method Laundry Co. v. MacCannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Strong v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Hammel v. NeylanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Continental Car-Na-Var Corp. v. MoseleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Aetna Building Maintenance Co. v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. American Credit Indemnity Co. v. SacksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. California Intelligence Bureau v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Moss, Adams & Co. v. ShillingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API