Legal Opinion
Texarkana & Ft. S. Ry. Co. v. La Velle
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 18, 1924No. 2865PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLew, J.
(after stating the facts as above). Complaint is made of the charge of the court reading:
“And if you further believe that the defendant had negligently either permitted to be placed, or permitted to remain in its position of close proximity to said car, the said skid, whereby plaintiff was injured, and if you further believe that the negligence, if any, of the defendant, was the proximate cause of the injuries as received by plaintiff, you will find for the plaintiff, unless you find for the defendant under other paragraphs of this charge. If the evidence fails to show that the defendant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lancaster v. FitchTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1910
- Texarkana & Ft. S. Ry. Co. v. La VelleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fort Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. RoweCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. GrossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Butz v. Union Pac. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
- Butz v. Union Pacific RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.