Legal Opinion

Butz v. Union Pac. R.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1951No. 7441Published

1DissentWolfe, Chief Justice

I dissent.

I believe the non-suit was properly granted. The plaintiff’s testimony fails to show that the defendant was negligent in not furnishing plaintiff with a reasonably safe place to work, and it further appears that plaintiff’s own failure in keeping a lookout was the sole proximate cause of his injuries.

The plaintiff is a switchman of 45 years railroad experience and has been employed by the Union Pacific for the last 25 years. During this period, he has performed *198switching services in the Denver yards and is familiar with the trackage, the physical layout of the yards, and the type of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Wilkerson v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Ellis v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Moore v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Terminal R. Ass'n of St. Louis v. FitzjohnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API