Legal Opinion · Dissent

Butz v. Union Pacific Railroad

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1951No. 7441Published

1DissentWolfe, Chief Justice

I believe that this court should announce to the Bar what leeway may be given to a construction of the pleadings and the issues framed thereby, after trial of the lawsuit and appeal to this court. The defendant railroad’s petition for rehearing raises this question, and it is a matter which was not given consideration in our former discussions.

Paragraph seven of the plaintiff’s complaint states as follows:

“That defendant was negligent, careless, heedless and reckless at the time and place aforesaid in the following particulars:
“(a) That defendant, well knowing that switchmen and other of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wetherbee v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  2. Waller v. Northern Pacific Terminal Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Butz v. Union Pac. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Texarkana & Ft. S. Ry. Co. v. La VelleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API