Legal Opinion

Davis v. Ak Steel, Unpublished Decision (2-13-2006)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 13, 2006No. CA2005-07-183UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants, Cheryl Davis and Robert Davis, appeal the decision of the Butler County Court of Common Pleas granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellant, AK Steel, in an employer intentional tort action.1 We affirm the trial court's decision.

{¶ 2} Appellant, Cheryl Davis, who was employed by appellee, severely injured her hand when she attempted to clean an 18-inch temper mill at appellee's Coshocton, Ohio facility. The mill contains two work rolls which create an ingoing nip point when operating in the "run" mode. The nip point is approximately 46 inches…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Blankenship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Fyffe v. Jeno's, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Jones v. VIP Development Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Roberts v. RMB Enterprises, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Williams v. ALPLA, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Wright v. Mar-Bal, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Rijo v. Reading Rock, Inc., Ca2007-09-223 (7-7-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API