Dillingham Construction N.A., Inc. v. County of Sonoma
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge:
The issue presented in this case is whether ERISA preempts the application of a state prevailing wage law that requires payment of prevailing wages to employees in apprenticeship programs that have not received state approval but allows the payment of lower apprenticeship wages to employees participating in state approved programs. We hold that it does.
I. CALIFORNIA APPRENTICESHIP REGULATIONS
As described by the district court, California’s administrative framework for regulating apprenticeships is complex. Rules and regulations establishing minimum standards of wages,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- MacKey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- FMC Corp. v. HollidaySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Air Transport Ass'n of America v. City and County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1998
- Dillingham Construction N.A. v. County of SonomaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Californians for Safe & Competitive Dump Truck Transportation v. MendoncaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1997
- Associated General Contractors of America v. Metropolitan Water District of Southern CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Dillingham Construction v. County of SonomaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.