Legal Opinion
Dillingham Construction v. County of Sonoma
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 7, 1995No. 92-15247PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
57 F.3d 712
63 USLW 2779, 130 Lab.Cas. P 57,917,
19 Employee Benefits Cas. 1409,
2 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1291,
Pens. Plan Guide P 23913H
DILLINGHAM CONSTRUCTION N.A., INC., a California
Corporation; Manuel J. Arceo, dba Sound Systems
Media, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
COUNTY OF SONOMA; Division of Labor Standards Enforcement;
Department of Industrial Relations, Division of
Apprenticeship Standards, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 92-15247.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted April 14, 1993.
Decided June 7, 1995.
Richard N. Hill, Littler, Mendelson, Fastiff, Tichy & Mathiason,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- MacKey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- FMC Corp. v. HollidaySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- WSB Electric, Inc. v. CurryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Dillingham Construction v. County of SonomaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999