Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Silk

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 7, 1977No. [Misc. Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 2, September Term, 1976.]PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

This Court having heard argument on the exceptions to the recommendation of the panel of judges designated to sit in the Circuit Court for Howard County and the answer filed thereto, it is this 7th day of February, 1977

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the recommendation be adopted and that Owen Joseph Silk, Jr. be, and he is hereby, disbarred from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED that the clerk of this Court shall forthwith strike the name of Owen Joseph Silk, Jr. from the register of attorneys and shall certify that fact to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. AgnewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Bar Ass'n v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  3. In Re MeyersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  4. Balliet v. BALTO. CTY. BAR ASS'NCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  5. In Re BartonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. NothsteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SperyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PostCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API