People v. Green
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN (G. A.), P. J.
Appellant was convicted after jury trial of burglary (Pen. Code, § 459).1 The jury found that he had served two prior prison terms (§ 667.5). He appeals from the judgment.
Miranda
Appellant contends that his statements made at the crime scene and at the police station were improperly admitted at trial because the prosecution failed to show the requisite warnings and waivers under Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U. S. 436 [16 L.Ed.2d 694, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 10 A.L.R.3d 974]. Appellant’s failure to object below on Miranda grounds precludes his present contentions. (People v.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. EspinozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- People v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- People v. CarkeekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. MilnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. TennerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- People v. HaneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- People v. ElmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.