Legal Opinion

People v. Elmore

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 28, 1990No. A047698PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REARDON, J.

A jury convicted appellant David Elmore of lewd conduct with a child under age 14. (Pen. Code, § 288, subd. (b).) The court found that he had served two prior prison terms and sentenced him to a new ten-year term. (See § 667.5, subd. (b).) He appeals, contending that there was insufficient evidence to support the findings that he had served two prior prison terms. We affirm the judgment, including the sentence.

I. Facts

In light of the limited issue before us, a lengthy discussion of the underlying facts of this case is not necessary. Appellant David Elmore was convicted of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People v. ArcegaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. People v. EspinozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. People v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ladd v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. TennerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. FielderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. People v. FlynnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Ladd v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API