Legal Opinion

United States v. Roman

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided December 22, 1972No. 25,613PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Darden, Chief Judge:

We granted review of this case on the issues whether the military judge was empowered to convene proceedings in revision; whether the sentence instructions were prejudicially erroneous ; and whether the sentence was illegally increased in the revision proceedings.

On October 26, 1971, accused was brought to trial before a general court-martial and pleaded guilty to charges of absence without leave and missing movement. The pleas were duly accepted, and the military judge entered findings of guilty. A military jury sentenced him to dishonorable discharge,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. DonohewUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. United States v. CraigUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  3. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  4. United States v. RobinsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  5. United States v. BarnesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. MayfieldNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API