United States v. Roman
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Darden, Chief Judge:
We granted review of this case on the issues whether the military judge was empowered to convene proceedings in revision; whether the sentence instructions were prejudicially erroneous ; and whether the sentence was illegally increased in the revision proceedings.
On October 26, 1971, accused was brought to trial before a general court-martial and pleaded guilty to charges of absence without leave and missing movement. The pleas were duly accepted, and the military judge entered findings of guilty. A military jury sentenced him to dishonorable discharge,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. DonohewUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. CraigUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
- United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
- United States v. RobinsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. BarnesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. MayfieldNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995