Legal Opinion
Kullar v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 14, 2008No. A119697PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POLLAK, J.
Objector Crystal Echeverría and two other objectors appeal from a judgment approving the terms of a settlement agreement entered in this class action against defendant Foot Locker Retail, Inc. (Foot Locker). They contend the trial court erred in finding the terms of the settlement to be fair, reasonable and adequate without any evidence of the amount to which class members would be entitled if they prevailed in the litigation, and without any basis to evaluate the reasonableness of the agreed recovery. The settlement was reached in arm’s-length negotiations between competent…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & AssociatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Wershba v. Apple Computer, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Hernandez v. Restoration Hardware, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2018
- Clark v. American Residential Services LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Cellphone Termination Fee CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Cellphone Termination Fee CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Cho v. Seagate Technology Holdings, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.