Cho v. Seagate Technology Holdings, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIGGINS, J.
Plaintiff Sara Cho filed a representative class action against Seagate Technology Holdings, Inc. (Seagate), for falsely overstating in advertising and packaging the storage capacity of computer disc drives that it manufactures for public sale. The case was settled and David Klausner objected to the settlement. Klausner argued the class definition was imprecise and misleading, and that there was the possibility of collusion between the parties affecting settlement negotiations. In particular, Klausner claimed that collusion was evident because once the parties learned of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Molski v. GleichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Hicks v. Kaufman & Broad Home Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Wershba v. Apple Computer, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Dunk v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- Cartt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Villacres v. Abm Industries Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- People v. JTH Tax, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Sotelo v. Medianews Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Nordstrom Commission CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Cellphone Termination Fee CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.