Rencehausen v. Western Greyhound Lines
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Chief Judge.
This is a writ of certiorari to review an award of the Industrial Commission of Arizona which denied compensation to the petitioner.
We are called upon to determine if petitioner’s injuries were sustained while he was within the scope and course of his employment.
The facts necessary for a determination of this matter are as follows. Petitioner was employed by respondent Western Greyhound Lines, Division of Greyhound Lines, Inc., as a bus driver. Because of lack of sufficient seniority the petitioner was on the “extra board” at the Phoenix terminal. The testimony indicates…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- McKay v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- McCampbell v. Benevolent & Protective Order of ElksArizona Supreme Court · 1950
- Sendejaz v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Hancock v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1957
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kerr v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Brooks v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Boone v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- City of Phoenix v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Brooks v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983