Legal Opinion

McConnell v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 17, 1985No. Docket Nos. B009338, B010023PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRIGNON, J. *

Appellant and defendant Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. (Merrill Lynch) appeals from an order made after judgment (Order) in favor of plaintiffs and respondents John A. McConnell, Marguerite McConnell and Caroline W. Barrie, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated (the Class). Merrill Lynch alternatively petitions this court for a writ of mandate modifying the Order from which it appealed. The petition for writ of mandate was deferred to be considered with the appeal. The Class has requested that sanctions be imposed on Merrill Lynch for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Wuest v. WuestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. McConnell v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Huber v. ShedoudyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. McConnell v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITHCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rojes v. Riverside General HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. Guseinov v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. City of Gardena v. Rikuo Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Papadakis v. ZelisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Lovett v. CarrascoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API