Legal Opinion
City of Gardena v. Rikuo Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 7, 2011No. B217302PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
ORDER
This appeal arises from an eminent domain action filed by plaintiff and respondent City of Gardena (the City) against defendant and appellant Rikuo Corporation (defendant). In 2004, following a mediation, the parties, in a written settlement agreement, settled the eminent domain action and a related inverse condemnation action. In 2006, pursuant to a stipulation by the parties, *599the trial court entered a “Judgment and Final Order of Condemnation” for both cases, retaining jurisdiction to determine the costs of ongoing remediation.1
Defendant appeals from two orders, entered…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Griset v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Sullivan v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Metropolitan Water District v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Judge v. Nijjar Realty, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- MinCal Consumer Law Group v. Carlsbad Police DepartmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Rancho Pauma Mutual Water Co. v. Yuima Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Howeth v. Coffelt, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Water Replenishment District of Southern California v. City of CerritosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.