Legal Opinion

Martinez v. City of Beverly Hills

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 10, 2021No. B305826Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 11/10/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO NIEVES MARTINEZ, B305826 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. BC667123) CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS, Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Daniel M. Crowley, Judge. Judgment affirmed. Carpenter, Zuckerman & Rowley, Gary S. Lewis, and Gregory A. Coolidge for Plaintiff and Appellant. Burke, Williams & Sorensen, Michael R. Nebenzahl, and Charles H. Abbott for Defendant and Respondent. ****** A…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Kesner v. Superior Court of Alameda CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Ortega v. Kmart Corp.California Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Carson v. Facilities Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1984

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API