Legal Opinion

Frazier v. Nashville Veterinary Hospital

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1917PublishedCited by 3 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Davidson County. —R. E. Blake, Special Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Neil

The facts agreed upon by counsel in the trial court, and here, are as follows:

Joe Frazier earned wages working by the hour for the National Casket Company, and there was paid to him during the first three weeks of June, 1917, and *442within thirty days prior to the service of the garnishment, more than $36; and during the last week of June, 1917, ending on the day of the service of the garnishment, he earned the sum of $13.45, which the garnishee, the National Casket Company, answered was due and owing to him as wages at the time of the service of the garnishment. The trial court, on these facts,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Malone v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  2. State ex rel. College of Bishops of M. E. Church v. Board of Trust of Vanderbilt UniversityTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Adcock v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Lockett v. BeaverTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Pine Bluff Water & Light Co. v. DerrisseauxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte NeislerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
  2. Family Clothing Corp. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1941
  3. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. Frost National BankDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API