Legal Opinion

Adcock v. Smith

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1896PublishedCited by 9 opinions

FROM KNOX. Appeal from Circuit Court of Knox County. J. W. Sneed, J.

1Opinion of the CourtWilkes, J.

This is a garnishment proceeding to reach what is claimed as exempt wages under the provisions of the Code (M. & V.), § 2931. This section, in effect, exempts from execution, seizure, or attachment thirty dollars of the wages of every me*374chanic or laboring man, and the only question is, does the defendant, William Smith, bring himself within the terms of this exemption. The cause was commenced before a Justice of the Peace and taken by appeal to the Circuit Court, and that Court held that the amount due defendant was due him as the wages of a laboring man and not the subject of garnishment,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ford v. St. L., K. & N. W. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1880

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Wilkes-Barre v. BarnumDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1908
  2. Patten Package Co. v. HouserSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  3. Estate of HollingsworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Gay v. Hudson River Electric Power Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1910
  5. Lewisburg Tennessee v. EmersonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API