Legal Opinion

Lockett v. Beaver

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1896PublishedCited by 5 opinions

EROM KNOX. Appeal from Chancery Court of Knox County. H. B. Lindsay, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtWilkes, J.

This case involves a question of garnishment. The case comes to us by appeal from the Court of Chancery Appeals, reversing the decree of the Chancellor. A summary of the findings of fact, as made by the Court of Chancery Appeals, is that when the bill of interpleader in the case was *397filed, Lockett & Brown, were indebted to J. B. Harrison in the sum of <§400 for services rendered in securing a loan from the Maryland Insurance Co. The services commenced December 15, 1894. Garnishment notices were served on Lockett & Brown December 31, 1894. The insurance company agreed to make the loan January…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Seymour v. CooperSupreme Court of Vermont · 1853

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gray v. HouckTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  2. In Re AndersonDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1972
  3. Frazier v. Nashville Veterinary HospitalTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Saunders v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937
  5. Timothy Dry Goods Co. v. HydeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API