Legal Opinion

Allum v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 26, 1913No. 1114PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 31260 (T. D. 33194).

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

This case involves pieces of dogskin sewn together in the form of rectangular mats, about 24 by 40 inches in size, the trade designation of which seems to be “dogskin mats” or “mats.”

No witnesses were called on behalf of the Government, while several testified for the importers. Upon the evidence the Board of General Appraisers found the merchandise to be—

Pieces of dogskin temporarily sewn together in the form of mats; * * * that the sewing of the pieces together is of a temporary character; that the mats are never used in the form in which they are imported; that the sewing of the pieces…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. RichterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. Carlowitz v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ayres, Bridges & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  2. Caracul Fur Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  3. Transport Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  4. United States v. M. Bernstein & SonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  5. Winograd Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API