Legal Opinion

United States v. M. Bernstein & Sons

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 27, 1931No. 3402Published

1Opinion of the CourtLenroot, Judge

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United-States Customs Court sustaining in part a protest of appellee against the classification and assessment for duty of certain merchandise by the collector of the port of New York.

The merchandise involved consists of dogskins, dressed. They were assessed for duty at 25 per centum ad valorem as “furs dressed on the skin” under the provisions of paragraph 1420 of the Tariff Act of 1922.

Several claims were made in appellee’s protest, but the one relied upon in the court below and here is the claim that the merchandise is dutiable by similitude to…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Akeroyd v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. La Manna v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. Ayres, Bridges & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  4. United States v. BorgfeldtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  5. Transport Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API