Legal Opinion
Palmer v. Asarco Inc.
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided August 13, 2007No. 03-CV-0498-CVE-PJC, 03-CV-0565-CVE-PJC, 03-CV-0566-CVE-PJC, 03-CV-0567-CVE-PJC, 03-CV-0569-CVE-PJCPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CLAIRE V. EAGAN, Chief Judge.
Now before the Court are Defendants’ Motion to Exclude the Expert Testimony of Bonnie [sic] F. Forrest, J.D., Ph.D. (Dkt.# 532), and Defendants’ Motion to Exclude the Expert Testimony of Jeanette Wasserstein (Dkt.# 521). Plaintiffs have filed a joint response to both motions.
I
The plaintiffs in this case are seven minor children who claim that they were injured because they were exposed to low levels of lead over an extended period of time. Plaintiffs assert that lead exposure resulted when defendants, mining companies that operated in an area of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Knight v. Kirby Inland Marine Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sugarman v. LilesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Baxter Ex Rel. Baxter v. TempleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- Rochkind v. StevensonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Perry v. Safeco Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2020