Legal Opinion
Stone v. First National Bank
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided November 22, 1920PublishedCited by 7 opinions
From Tillamook: George B. Baglet, Judge. In Banc. Motion to dismiss appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtMcBRIDE, C. J.
1. This is a motion to dismiss an appeal. The undertaking was not served and filed until twelve days after the notice of appeal had been served and filed. Section 550, subdivision 2, Or. L., requires the undertaking to be filed within ten days from the service of notice of appeal. Subdivision 4 of the same section is as follows:
“From the expiration of the time allowed to except to the sureties in the undertaking, or from the justification thereof if excepted to, the appeal shall be deemed perfected. When a party in good faith gives due notice as hereinabove provided of an appeal from a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Trist v. ChildSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Christmas v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Wright v. EllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- McKissick v. McKissickOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Mitchell v. CoachOregon Supreme Court · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Western States Finance Co. v. RuffOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Oregon Mutual Insurance v. CornelisonOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Wiltse v. SchaefferMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
- Paul v. Livestock State BankOregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Bugge v. Far West Federal Bank, S.B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.