Legal Opinion

Western States Finance Co. v. Ruff

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1923PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOURT, J.

Plaintiff commenced this suit against the defendant for the purpose of determining an adverse claim of the defendant to a parcel of real property in Hood River County. Plaintiff, in its complaint, alleged that it was then the owner in fee simple of the land referred to, and in the actual and exclusive possession thereof.

The answer of defendant admitted plaintiff’s allegations of ownership and-possession. As an affirma*444tive defense, defendant alleged in substance that on tbe twenty-second day of January, 1921, and for a long time prior thereto, the defendant was a married woman and the wife of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Christmas v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Travellers' Insurance v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Michaels v. PostSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Knott v. Manufacturing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. May v. EmersonOregon Supreme Court · 1908

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tahoe National Bank v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Coast Bank v. MinderhoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Equitable Trust Co. v. ImbesiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  4. Moeur v. Farm Builders Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Kelly v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API