Legal Opinion

Oregon Mutual Insurance v. Cornelison

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1958PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

This is a proceeding in interpleader involving conflicting claims to the proceeds of a policy of fire insurance on a dwelling house in Elgin, Union County, Oregon, which was partially destroyed by fire. The plaintiff, Oregon Mutual Insurance Company, which issued the policy, feeling that it could not safely pay the money to any of the claimants, filed this suit, paid the money into court, and was discharged.

The following persons were made parties defendants : Mary A. Cornelison, who was a conditional-sale purchaser of the land on which the house was built, and her husband, C. E. Cornelison;…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Barnes v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Ingersoll v. CoramSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Nordyke & Marmon Co. v. GeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Jamison Coal & Coke Co. v. GoltraCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  5. B. Kuppenheimer & Co. v. MorninCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Alaska Sales and Service, Inc. v. MilletAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Lakeshore Bank & Trust Co. v. United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Travelers Insurance Co. v. Angus (In Re Angus)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1981
  4. Carolina Attractions, Inc. v. CourtneyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  5. Kalmanoff v. WeitzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API