Legal Opinion

In re the Discipline of an Attorney

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 11, 2008PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBotsford, J.

Bar counsel appeals from the decision of the single justice dismissing the petition for discipline of an attorney. Principally at issue is the propriety of certain provisions in the attorney’s form contingent fee agreement that go beyond the terms of the model contingent fee agreement set out in the Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct. Bar counsel also challenges the attorney’s conduct in misrepresenting the existence of a statutory lien pursuant to G. L. c. 221, § 50, in failing to notify one client promptly of his receipt of personal injury protection (PIP) funds, and in refusing to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Boswell v. Zephyr Lines, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  2. Liss v. StudenyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  3. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Goldstone & Sudalter, P.C.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  4. Malonis v. HarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  5. Salem Realty Co. v. MateraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ropes & Gray LLP v. Jalbert (In Re Engage, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  2. Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman v. PalmiscianoDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
  3. Bank of America, N.A. v. Prestige Imports, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
  4. Ropes & Gray LLP v. JalbertCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  5. Sunrise Equipment & Excavation, Inc. v. Construction Management & Builders, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API