Legal Opinion
MacAlma v. Bank United of Texas
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 15, 1995No. C-95-2091 DLJPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JENSEN, District Judge.
On December 13, 1995, the Court heard arguments on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. Having considered the arguments of counsel and the papers submitted, the Court hereby GRANTS defendant’s motion for summary judgment and DENIES plaintiffs motion for summary judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Factual Background and Procedural History
Plaintiffs in this action are Florentino and Norma Macalma, debtors in a total of three separate bankruptcy proceedings. The defendant is Bank United of Texas, which held a deed encumbering the plaintiffs jointly owned home located…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kaiser Cement Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Fischbach and Moore, Inc., the Howard P. Foley Co., a District of Columbia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Ellis v. Parr (In Re Ellis )United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tully v. World Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Jauregui v. Ricci (In Re Jauregui)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 1996
- Nghiem v. Ghazvini (In Re Nghiem)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2001