Legal Opinion
Humphreys v. General Motors Corp.
District Court, N.D. Florida
Decided December 13, 1993No. 91-50256PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
COLLIER, District Judge.
Defendant, General Motors Corporation, moves for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (doc. 108). Plaintiffs, Jackie and David Humphreys, have opposed this motion. After reviewing the pleadings, evidence of record and the legal briefs of the parties, the Court concludes Defendant’s motion for summary judgment must be GRANTED.
Background
This suit arose out of a four-car accident occurring on November 9, 1987 on State Road'390 at or near its intersection with Main Avenue in Panama City, Florida. During the accident,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marian Fontenot, Etc. v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- William L. Tippens, Deceased, Nell P. Tippens, Individually and as Widow of William L. Tippens v. The Celotex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- West v. Caterpillar Tractor Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hall v. Sunjoy Industries Group, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2011
- Mazda Motor Corp. v. LindahlSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
- Stender v. VincentHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
- Pinchinat v. Graco Children's Products, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2005
- Colville v. Pharmacia & Upjohn Company LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.