Legal Opinion

Colombo v. Hewitt

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarris, J.

(Pro Tempore)

The plaintiffs, Ernest E.. Colombo and Ardelle J. Colombo, husband and wife, and M. B. Marsh and Martha E. Marsh, husband and wife, in this suit allege that the defendants, Boy H. Hewitt and Susie A. Hewitt, husband and wife, and "William A. Adams and Elizabeth 0. Adams, husband and wife, about October 1, 1956, blocked and obstructed a portion of a public roadway known as Old County Boad No. 227, or former 18th Street, near Eugene, Oregon. The parties hereto, as husbands and wives, are owners of certain real property, the location of which in relation to Old County Boad No. 227…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tustin v. GauntOregon Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Stadelman v. MinerOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Beck v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  4. State v. OfficerOregon Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Small v. BinfordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nyman v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Nyman v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. Nyman v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API