Legal Opinion

Tustin v. Gaunt

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1873PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from Yamhill County.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Prim:, J.:

This was' an action of ejectment in the Circuit Court of Yamhill County to recover the one-eightli of one hundred and ninety acres of land situate in the county of Yamhill, State of Oregon. Caleb S. Tustin, the appellant, claims title as one of the heirs of his father, Charles S. Tustin, who died intestate in said county in the fall of 1862, seized of the land in question, leaving a widow and seven other children besides appellant.'

Respondent claims title to the land under a sale made by the administrator of the estate by said Tustin, deceased, in pursuance of certain…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hahn v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Hathaway v. HemingwaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1850

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Hillman v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Fishburn v. LondershausenOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Rutenic v. HamakarOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Monastes v. CatlinOregon Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Knapp v. WallaceOregon Supreme Court · 1907

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API