Legal Opinion

Small v. Binford

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 16, 1908No. 6,202PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Prom Hancock Circuit Court; Edward W. Felt, Judge. Suit by Penina Binford and others against Rose C. Small and others. Prom a decree for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtRoby, C. J.

Plaintiffs, appellees herein, brought suit against defendants, averring that the latter claim and exercise a right to enter upon and pass over their forty-seven and forty-eight-hundredths-acre tract of land, and in so doing have torn down gates and fences, and are threatening to continue the exercise of such alleged right. They pray that the defendants be enjoined from so doing. Defendants filed a cross-complaint, alleging that there is a way over plaintiffs’ land, established by forty-three-years’ user, and praying that their right to use the same may be set at rest, and that the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ross v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Village of Grandville v. JenisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Xenia Real Estate Co. v. MacyIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Parish v. KaspareIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Nowlin v. WhippleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Western Aggregates, Inc. v. County of YubaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Malloy v. ReyesSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
  3. Stewart v. SwartzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Fisher v. CareyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. McHenry v. FouttyIndiana Supreme Court · 1945

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API