Legal Opinion

People v. Blakley

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 12, 1974PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRabin, J.

This appeal requires us to decide whether a prosecutor may condition an offer to recommend a reduced plea upon the defendant’s withdrawal of his claim that his right to a speedy trial has been violated. We conclude that the nature of the speedy trial guarantee renders such a condition inherently coercive in a plea bargaining situation and that the plea so conditioned must be vacated. Having so concluded, we also reach, in the interests of judicial economy, the underlying speedy trial claim, and hold that the defendant’s right to a speedy trial has been violated and that the indictment must be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Strunk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. People v. ProsserNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. Ganci v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. People v. SeabergNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. People v. CallahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. People v. TaranovichNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. People v. HansenNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. People v. PelchatNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API