Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Thor Motor Coach Inc

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided August 31, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00375Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION JENNIFER HAYES, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:19-CV-00375 DRL-MGG THOR MOTOR COACH, INC., Defendant. OPINION & ORDER The court erred in its prior opinion when it divided Jennifer Hayes’ piece-rate wages by 40 hours (non-overtime hours) to calculate her regular rate of pay when it should have divided her piece- rate wages by her total hours (non-overtime hours plus overtime hours). See

29 C.F.R. § 778.111. The court appreciates Thor Motor Coach raising this issue.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Stephanie Carlson v. CSX Transportation, IncorporaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  4. Reynolds v. CB Sports Bar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  5. Marlon Hall v. DIRECTV, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API