Legal Opinion

Forstmann Woolen Co. v. Alexander's Department Stores., Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 30, 1951PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEIBELL, District Judge.

Plaintiff brings this action against defendant claiming that the defendant has infringed plaintiff’s registered trademark and plaintiff’s copyrighted label and has unfairly competed with plaintiff by using plaintiff’s trademark and label in advertising coats and women’s wear made of plaintiff’s woolen and worsted fabrics. Plaintiff seeks an injunction, an accounting, damages and the destruction of plaintiff’s labels in defendant’s possession.

Defendant’s answer admits that on several occasions it advertised garments made of Forstmann woolens and that it sold goods and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ring v. SpinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  2. Alden-Rochelle, Inc. v. American Soc. of Composers, Authors & PublishersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  3. Bruckman v. HollzerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  4. Forstmann Woolen Co. v. Murray Sices Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
  5. Ford v. C. E. Wilson & Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Phi Delta Theta Fraternity v. JA Buchroeder & CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1966
  2. Coca-Cola Company v. Howard Johnson CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1974
  3. Institutional Drug Distributors, Inc. v. YankwichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  4. Institutional Drug Distributors v. YankwichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  5. Institutional Drug Distributors, Inc. v. YankwichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API