Legal Opinion · Dissent

Institutional Drug Distributors, Inc. v. Yankwich

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 20, 1957No. Misc. No. 637Published

1Dissent

BARNES, Circuit Judge.

I dissent from the Order denying leave to file petition for mandamus. This petition discloses a matter where the rarely to be used writ of mandamus would be justified. Jurisdiction being with this Court, (United States Alkali Export Ass’n v. United States, 325 U.S. 196, 204, 65 S.Ct. 1120, 89 L.Ed. 1554), I do not believe the petition should be denied.

The issue involved is petitioner’s right to a trial by jury, for which timely demand was made, on an issue of fact. It is settled that an action for damages for an Antitrust violation is one at law. Weeks v. Bareco Oil Co.,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States Alkali Export Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Weeks v. Bareco Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  3. Paramount Pictures, Inc. v. Rodney, U.S. District Judge (Two Cases). Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. Rodney, U.S. District Judge (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  4. Bereslavsky v. CaffeyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  5. Leimer v. Woods, Housing ExpediterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API