Legal Opinion

Bruckman v. Hollzer

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 7, 1946No. 11177PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

Petitioners, defendants below, hereinafter called defendants, seek mandamus to compel the respondent judge to strike the demand for a jury trial upon and to hear and determine in equity the claim of the complaint of Plarold Lloyd Corporation, plaintiff below, for money damages to it for an infringement by the three defendants of plaintiff’s copyright of its photoplay The Freshman. Defendants contend in support of our power to issue the writ that the District Court’s order for trial as at common law by jury is beyond its jurisdiction and that by assuming it the court…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Ex Parte Republic of PeruSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Original Ballet Russe, Ltd. v. Ballet Theatre, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Swofford v. B & W, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  4. Ring v. SpinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  5. Leimer v. Woods, Housing ExpediterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API