State v. Storm
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
POLLOCK, J.
At issue is whether Rule 7:4-4(b) permits private counsel for a complainant to prosecute a complaint in the municipal court. The Woodbridge Municipal Court permitted Robert Hedesh, Esq., private counsel for complainant, Pamela Young, to prosecute complaints against defendant, Richard Storm, for stalking, contrary to N.J.S.A. 2C:12~10b, and harassment, contrary to N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4. After the Law Division denied Storm’s motion for leave to appeal, the Appellate Division granted leave and reversed. It held that Hedesh had a conflict of interest…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Voytko v. Ramada Inn of Atlantic CityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1978
- Gardner v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
- State of NJ v. ImperialeDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
- State of NJ v. KinderDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Wilson v. WilsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re the Grand Jury Appearance Request by LoigmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
- State v. HessenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- State v. CabanaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.