Legal Opinion

Anheuser Busch, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 2001No. 00CA2242PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge ROTHENBERG.

In this appeal from a final worker's compensation order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (ICAO), claimant, David Shultz, has moved to dismiss the appeal of the employer, Anheuser Busch, Inc., and its insurer, the Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (collectively employer), based on employer's failure to file a cost bond pursuant to CAR. 7.

Before ruling, we asked the parties to address whether the requirement of a cost bond under C.A.R. 7 applies to appeals filed pursuant to C.A.R. 8.1. We conclude CAR. 7 does not apply to such appeals, and we…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Farina v. DISTRICT COURT OF 21ST JDSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  2. Town of Superior v. Midcities Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  3. People v. Arellano-AvilaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  4. McFarlen v. EckhartColorado Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Teriano v. Nevada State BankNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  2. People ex rel. A.J.H.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Crawford v. MelbyColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. People v. MontoyaColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Siener v. ZeffColorado Court of Appeals · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API