Legal Opinion
McDaniel v. Sage
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided May 11, 1981No. 2-779A204PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Judge.
In March, 1975 appellant Richard McDaniel filed his amended complaint against the appellees Margaret Watters, R.N., and Charles V. Sage, M.D., alleging Watters negligently administered an injection prescribed by Sage who McDaniel claimed was also liable on an agency theory. At the close of McDaniel’s evidence on the first day of trial, the court granted Sage’s Motion for Judgment on the Evidence (Directed Verdict) pursuant to Ind. Rules of Procedure, Trial Rule 50(A), based on a finding that there was no evidence that Watters acted as Sage’s agent when she administered the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Huff v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1977
- Duprey v. ShaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Iterman v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
- Ross v. SchubertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Davis v. SchneiderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Panaro v. Electrolux Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Flintridge Station Associates v. American Fletcher Mortgage Company and American Fletcher National BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Wright v. District Court in & for the County of JeffersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc. v. Indiana Department of State Revenue, Gross Income Tax DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- MacIas v. Inland Steel Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.