Legal Opinion

MacIas v. Inland Steel Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 26, 1986No. 85-1840PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE BILANDIC

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff, Pedro Macias, brought this negligence action against defendant, Inland Steel Company (Inland), to recover damages for personal injuries sustained during the demolition of an Inland plant in Gary, Indiana. After a jury trial, judgment was entered against Inland in the sum of $800,000.

Inland’s principal contentions are: (1) that the trial court erred by refusing to direct a verdict or enter a judgment n.o.v. in favor of defendant because plaintiff failed to establish any duty owed to him by defendant; and (2) that the court…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Nelson v. Union Wire Rope Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Wilson v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Brown v. Decatur Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Batteast v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Schaffner v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  3. Kosinski v. Inland Steel Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  4. Kosinski v. Inland Steel Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API