Legal Opinion

Samuel Shapiro & Co., Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 10, 1953No. C. D. 1566PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

EKwall, Judge:

These are protests, consolidated at the trial, against the collector’s assessment of duty on four carved marble urns and one carved wooden urn. The marble urns were assessed at 25 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 232 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, as manufactures of marble, and the wooden one at 16% per centum ad valorem under paragraph 412 of the said tariff act, as modified by the Annecy Protocol of Terms of Accession to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 52373, and the President's…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Baumgarten & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. Stern v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  3. Samuel Shapiro & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. T. D. Downing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API