Legal Opinion

Samuel Shapiro & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 29, 1952No. C. D. 1409PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eicwall, Judge:

This is a protest arising at the port of Baltimore against the collector’s assessment of duty on certain marble statuary at 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1547 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as works of art, including statuary, not specially provided for, and on other manufactures of marble at 25 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 232 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802. It is claimed that the merchandise is entitled to free entry under paragraph 1807 as original sculptures or statuary. At the trial…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Baldwin Shipping Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Forest Lawn Memorial-Park v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  2. Forest Lawn Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  3. Brantman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  4. Samuel Shapiro & Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  5. Descoware Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API