People v. Merritt
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
We are asked in this case to determine whether a trial judge abused his discretion in precluding defendant from testifying about an alibi or from presenting his alibi witnesses under our state’s former alibi notice statute, MCLA 768.20; MSA 28.1043. Further, we are asked to consider whether the alibi notice statute is constitutional, or if it violates defendant’s rights to due process and to compulsory process. We hold there was such an abuse of discretion. We therefore reverse the conviction and remand for a new trial. It is therefore unnecessary to reach the issue of constitutionality in…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Avery v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- People v. YostMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- People v. TalleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- People v. HayesMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Luis Albert Alicea v. John R. Gagnon, Superintendent, and the Attorney General of WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- State v. BoucinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.