State Ex Rel. McDougall v. Superior Court
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIDEL, Chief Judge.
In a forfeiture proceeding, must a claim be personally verified by the claimant, or may it be verified by counsel or another person familiar with the facts? That question is presented in this special action, which requires us to examine the relationship between Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. (“A.R.S.”) section 13-4311(E) (1989) and Rule 11(b), Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure. We hold that the statute requires the claimant to personally verify the claim.
BACKGROUND
When claimant Blair West was arrested for weapons and narcotic violations, the police seized firearms and $1513 in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Phoenix of Hartford, Inc. v. Harmony Restaurants, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- State v. WarnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Upton v. Cochise County Board of Adjustment, District 1Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Weigel v. HohnArizona Supreme Court · 1935
3Cited by10 opinions
- Drozda v. McComasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Graf v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- Yuma Regional Medical Center v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Phillips v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Thielking v. KirschnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.