United States v. Sober
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.
Of the several points argued in this criminal appeal, the only one that needs any detailed analysis is the assertion that the United States Attorney deprived the defendants of a fair trial by highly prejudicial and inflammatory remarks in the course of his summation. However, for a sound understanding of that question it is necessary to state and dispose of the basic situations arising from the two multiple count indictments against the five appellants.
All of the appellants were either officers, directors or both of the Old Free-port Bank, Freeport, Pennsylvania.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Di Carlo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. PanepintoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Kirk v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- United States v. Stanley J. PolackCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- United States v. SigalDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
- State v. CoutureSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.